Crown of Ruin

Statistics: Lost Paths: Ahl-i-Batin and Taftâni

Core Game Ratings

Rating: 5.77 / Ranking: 2139

These ratings are based on 3 ratings with 2.00 average weight and 2 reviews.

This is compared to an index-wide 3.64 average ratings and 1.98 average weight.

This rating earns a low level of trust because of its low level of input.

Ratings + Reviews:

0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
9%
82%
9%
0%
0%
 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10 

Index Ratings Only:

0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
33%
33%
0%
0%
 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10 

RPGnet Reviews Only:

0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10 

Core Game Reviews

All RPGnet Reviews

[ Link Reviews ]
Rating User Summary
3 + 4Carl L. CongdonLost Paths: Ahl-i-Batin and Taftâni. In sum: meaty information on two Traditions so different and yet so alike, but skimpy info on the societies and cultures surrounding them.
3 + 4Bradford C. WalkerLost Paths: Ahl-i-Batin and Taftâni. It's a meaty book that does very well to make one old faction new again, presents another new one, and makes them both very playble. Check it out.

Ratings Explanation

The following components make up a rating:

Ratings. The ratings that users enter into this index are each averaged into the final rating with a weight of between 0 and 4, with weight based on trust algorithms.

Reviews. Each review is averaged into the final rating with a weight of 8. Sometimes reviews can skew high, but they also display fan interest (or disdain) in a product.

Content. The average rating of each content--before its own bayesian weight is inserted--is averaged into the final rating. The weight of a content is equal to its own weight divided by the number of contents, and divided again if it only appears in a fraction of editions.

Bayesian Weight. A rating of 5.00 is inserted into the final rating with a weight of 35. This is an arbitrary weighting of the average rating that keeps things toward the center until they're better rated.